codecov[bot]
commented
3 weeks ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 79.6%. Comparing base (
6a91b15) to head (fe23641). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #281 +/- ## ======================================= - Coverage 79.8% 79.6% -0.3% ======================================= Files 12 12 Lines 966 966 ======================================= - Hits 771 769 -2 - Misses 195 197 +2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-predictor/pull/281/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-predictor/pull/281/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | `79.6% <ø> (-0.3%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
So far, there was no
ECRgate support from BQSKit and, therefore, it was not possible to synthesize to the OQC gateset that comprises exactly that gate. This has changed with v1.2.