Closed famosab closed 3 years ago
Changing the default solver in the config file to gurobi worked for me. Gurobi provides an academic license.
Did your reconstructions run successfully with gurobi?
Although, in theory, we support both I found gurobi to be slower and fail more often to find the optimal solution. All the benchmarks on model quality have been run on cplex only.
Gurobi worked for the one genome I tested it with.
However IBM told me that they plan to bring back the academic version but this make take some months.
Thanks, that's good to know. I will keep CPLEX as the preferred solver since I haven't properly tested the pipeline using Gurobi so far.
If anyone encounters the same problem I would recommend to try to get an installer for one of the previous versions that were still supported by the academic initiative (I think the latest was 12.8).
Just for your information: I installed the ILOG CPLEX Optimizer (12.9) today using the academic licence IBM provides.
I have just downloaded the latest version of CPLEX, it continues to be free for academic users.
I tried following the links given in the docs but had to find out that IBM does not offer their academic deal for the CPLEX Optimizer software anymore. I asked them for sponsoring for my work but since this is crucial for CarveMe to run, it should be indicated in the README.