Closed FND closed 3 years ago
this avoids false positives, notably application/jsonlines
application/jsonlines
fixes #296 - maybe?
I'm not sure this is the right approach either way, plus if we go the RegEx route, we should probably include +json$ too?
+json$
superseded by #302
thanks for making the ball roll
fixes #296 - maybe?
I'm not sure this is the right approach either way, plus if we go the RegEx route, we should probably include
+json$
too?