Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Because the code calls TerminateAll without a parameter and that blocks until
all tasks are terminated.
Original comment by gabr42
on 2 Dec 2012 at 6:10
Original comment by gabr42
on 2 Dec 2012 at 6:10
Yes but how to avoid this? TerminateAll(0) ?
Can i create and stop tasks within Parallel.Async() to avoid blocking the main
UI when stoping and starting thread pool?
Original comment by david.lo...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2012 at 6:14
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
david.lo...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2012 at 11:16