Open SFJohnson24 opened 1 month ago
@SFJohnson24 If the changes suggested in #840 are applied to get USDM data read in OK, I've found that it is possible to run local rules for USDM datasets - the -lr
argument then works as expected.
The only real issue is that a CORE id is needed to uniquely identify the issues reported by the validation - but I found that assigning a temporary CORE id (e.g., "DRAFT-{Rule Id}") in the local rule YAML file works around that issue.
Currently we are not able to run USDM datasets with the -LR command. The JSON is not parsed into dataset with the -lr flag.