Open dpackham opened 8 years ago
I see a file in the database.. with the Man of 144... should it connect with that?
Are yo compiling the binary yourself?
no downloaded from a link posted UHH somewhere. a few iterations. where is the REAL latest one?
There is no current binding that supports security, so unfortunately we can’t add this device into a binding that has the security classes.
On 3 May 2016, at 17:13, dpackham notifications@github.com wrote:
no downloaded from a link posted UHH somewhere. a few iterations. where is the REAL latest one?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/cdjackson/HABmin/issues/306#issuecomment-216580729
hmmm... i followd this https://github.com/openhab/openhab/wiki/ZWave-Security-Testing and it looks like its working... just not finding the XML files for the locks. right?
can/should I compile my own jar? to help test?
No -this version is not the released version. The current version of zwave does not contain support for locks.
OK cool. when I load up OH2 it sees the locks and configured them automagically.. is there dev code I can run or get from cloudbees? or will the secure lock code only be in OH2?
It will likely only be in OH2. I’m not convinced it’s working well although I have used it with my Yale locks but I intend to spend some time looking at this over the next week or two.
ok. so i do see the XML file in your online database can I compile a jar and include that? I would be willing to test with/for you. im in the middle of migrating from my Vera ( with your UI there ) to OH so im willing to give some time right now :)
Yes - you should be able to compile a JAR yourself and export the XML from the database.
I don’t have an OH1 environment at the moment so am really doing most of the development in OH2. The security classes aren’t 100% at the moment so I need to spend some time to resolve that and will likely spend this weekend at it.
On 3 May 2016, at 18:24, dpackham notifications@github.com wrote:
ok. so i do see the XML file in your online database can I compile a jar and include that? I would be willing to test with/for you. im in the middle of migrating from my Vera ( with your UI there ) to OH so im willing to give some time right now :)
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/cdjackson/HABmin/issues/306#issuecomment-216603305
Cool... let me know if you want me to test. I can also allow you SSH into my OH1 box for test as well. its not critical for me right now so its good timing
can I get access to add the 910 xml to your database? i have an account under username dpackham now. my 910 says its manufacturer
ID 144. prolly due to the zwave card saying black and decker on it. (ebay special)
Attaching photos
Hi, I’ve updated your access.
Regarding the manufacturer, this is currently set as Kwikset. Probably, this name is wrong - it’s probably an OEM manufacturer, but we can’t have multiple manufacturers with the same ID…
What is a ‘910’ anyway?
Cheers Chris
On 24 Jun 2016, at 20:48, dpackham notifications@github.com wrote:
can I get access to add the 910 xml to your database? i have an account under username dpackham now. my 910 says its manufacturer
ID 144. prolly due to the zwave card saying black and decker on it.
Attaching photos
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/707522/16348853/44f2646c-3a12-11e6-8e40-f333bc30e5c0.jpg https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/707522/16348858/4bffce34-3a12-11e6-93a0-86abfcc13297.png — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cdjackson/HABmin/issues/306#issuecomment-228444522, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AA_kQ1kEDa-Q0aRosDABXcPJTQ8qImkUks5qPDSCgaJpZM4IV0xw.
Just a deadbolt. so if I add this can I build a secure jar to control the lock? or do I still need to go to OH2 for the control?
OH2 doesnt see the 910 either yet :)
Dave
so I added it but I think I messed up. its really just the same as the 914 that you have already in the database (I think) with a new man ID of 144 I think due to the B&D zwave card in it... Teach me Obi Wan ;) I mean all the docs I have found say they are the same...
It looks like it created a new device when it should have updated the existing device. For some reason the manufacturer is showing incorrectly as 0…
I just had a look at the XML files you loaded - they aren’t the right type. The XML that should have been loaded i the one that OH creates automatically - not the database files which is what it looks like you’ve loaded…
So, I’ve deleted the new entry that you created - I think the original version is fine despite the B&D label. The manufacturer is the same as the other Kwikset 914, so it should just use that...
On 24 Jun 2016, at 21:13, dpackham notifications@github.com wrote:
so I added it but I think I messed up. its really just the same as the 914 that you have already in the database (I think) with a new man ID of 144 I think due to the B&D zwave card in it... Teach me Obi Wan ;)
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cdjackson/HABmin/issues/306#issuecomment-228450750, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AA_kQ8p_gF6sWu7ZLM_K-OgoxxusgSAbks5qPDpwgaJpZM4IV0xw.
Here is what OH created for that node...
maybe for now ill run my locks from my vera with the openhab binding
and keep trying to get OH2 working well enough to run them
Dave P
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Chris Jackson notifications@github.com wrote:
It looks like it created a new device when it should have updated the existing device. For some reason the manufacturer is showing incorrectly as 0…
I just had a look at the XML files you loaded - they aren’t the right type. The XML that should have been loaded i the one that OH creates automatically - not the database files which is what it looks like you’ve loaded…
So, I’ve deleted the new entry that you created - I think the original version is fine despite the B&D label. The manufacturer is the same as the other Kwikset 914, so it should just use that...
On 24 Jun 2016, at 21:13, dpackham notifications@github.com wrote:
so I added it but I think I messed up. its really just the same as the 914 that you have already in the database (I think) with a new man ID of 144 I think due to the B&D zwave card in it... Teach me Obi Wan ;)
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/cdjackson/HABmin/issues/306#issuecomment-228450750>, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AA_kQ8p_gF6sWu7ZLM_K-OgoxxusgSAbks5qPDpwgaJpZM4IV0xw .
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cdjackson/HABmin/issues/306#issuecomment-228472122, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AArLwghBuCmMr1Bd1Lh1TnYgzU2oWz_Pks5qPFLjgaJpZM4IV0xw .
I have running 1.8.2 with the 4 week old zwave jar 1.9.0 from the ZWave-Security-Testing wiki page.
My Kwikset 910 locks are coming up with "NODE 12: No database entry: Manufacturer:144 [ID:1,Type:1]"
when I run OH2 it see them as Kwikset 914 locks and does not throw errors. how can i update the OH1 jar to see the 910's?