Open drsaltiel opened 9 years ago
The code looks simple and effective. It would be easier to review had for part one you truncated the output as you did in part two. Besides that, the code looks as though it does everything it is supposed to do in an efficient and readable manner.
@ghego, @craigsakuma, @kebaler
The code looks simple and effective. It would be easier to review had for part one you truncated the output as you did in part two. Besides that, the code looks as though it does everything it is supposed to do in an efficient and readable manner.
@ghego, @craigsakuma, @kebaler