Page Feedback component requirements document

cds-snc / design-gc-conception

MIT License

4 stars 0 forks source link

Page Feedback component requirements document #1129

Open daine opened 2 months ago

daine commented 2 months ago

📇 User story

As a GCDS Components developer, I want to have the requirements for building and implementing the new page feedback component, so that all stakeholders can clearly understand the needs and functionality of the developed component

✅ Definition of Done / Outcomes

[ ] Done when requirements are written
[ ] Done when requirement doc is reviewed by a fellow developer (optional)
[ ] Done when requirement doc is reviewed by a designer (optional)
[ ] Done when requirement doc has final review by tech lead (optional)
[ ] Done when requirement doc has final review by design lead (optional)

📜 Acceptance criteria

Add here the list of assumed steps that will be needed to complete the task

[ ] Contains the data model
[ ] Contains properties
[ ] Contains a11y considerations (optional)
[ ] Contains design contributions (optional)

adorayi commented 2 months ago

Build will be done by Pierre Need a design ticket Need an epic and accompanying tickets (content)

adorayi commented 2 months ago

Lana stewart is the PO for the page feedback tool, we should collaborate.

daine commented 1 month ago

Initial requirements documentation has been started in this document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TmKBmlBmx9QfgSPlYefOl_8gVD1QGtfObMRseu7UmVU/edit

I'm hoping we can collectively review and collaborate on further revisions as needed. I will ask a review from another dev this week, and touch base with @SmartMouthWords midweek for a review and feedback as well.

ClementineHahn commented 1 month ago

Requirements to be worked in collaboration with DTO and taking in consideration also first work proposed by Pierre in this PR #638. Looking to have alignment conversation :

1 with Pierre to help align dev for requirements
1 with Lana (PO of feedback tool) and design

daine commented 1 month ago

Met with Lana to discuss some points in the requirements document Met with Pierre to get the conversation going, he has some work he's done on the requirements document on his side. We have asked him to input his work into the google doc so we can collaborate together and review.

daine commented 2 weeks ago

We met with Pierre on Oct 23 to discuss some changes to the requirements documentation. We agreed to work async on rethinking some of the names for the properties and slots.

One thing we are starting to agree on is to call the component Feedback instead of specifically PageFeedback. @SmartMouthWords I'm tagging you here for visibility. We may want the design team to look into this component soon.