As a user, I want to automate checks to ensure that new routes have the correct associated WAF rules

[jzbahrai]

Description

Check that the new/ existing routes and associated WAF rules are correct (no typos etc) This was part of this incident: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Qx4WtcUu5DLKlF4BhbTMFLTBLGszGHkvyf0rGnbyGA/edit

Documentation and Artifacts

Good docs, figma mockups, ADRs, screenshots etc.

Acceptance Criteria

Given some context, when (X) action occurs, then (Y) outcome is achieved

• [ ] Cypress UI tests if needed.

• [ ] Generate appropriate log messages so that executions of this feature can be tracked

• [ ] Can misuse of this feature cause harm? If yes, create an alert

• [ ] Update the status of related findings, insights, and hypotheses on the Research Airtable

• [ ] Once change/fix/feature is implemented, link relevant Airtable records to design artifacts (Figma)

• [ ] Does the feature change our Information Architecture? If so, update the Sitemap in En/Fr

• A11y

• Bilingualism

• Privacy considerations

• Security controls in place

• Measuring success and metrics

Related Research Airtable records

• (find stuff yourself)

QA Steps

• [ ] Tested in a realistic production scenario

[yaelberger-commits]

Hey team! Please add your planning poker estimate with Zenhub @andrewleith @jzbahrai @whabanks