Closed isius closed 2 weeks ago
Why do you feel quotes are required around fw_dtb and that it is a typo that they are not present?
I can see an argument that fw_dtb should be flagged as code in the markdown, eg: fw_dtb
(using back-tick single quotes), but I don't see why double-quotes are desired.
Initially I fixed only the typos of "fw_dft" (which I spent way too much time trying to find reference to) on lines 327 and 340.
Along the way I figured I'd match the existing "fw_dtb" (with quotes) on line 251.
Per your suggestion, I agree that back ticks would be preferrable.
Thanks! I didn't notice the fw_dtb/fw_dft typo, and being consistent with the quotes is a good thing. Thanks for the contribution!
Fix fw_dtb typos