Open philsturgeon opened 9 years ago
Thanks for reporting, already seen your tweet about it :)
The implementation is correct according to grubers markdown syntax description: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#code According to that, if you want to include a literal backtick, you have to surround the whole code tag with more than one backtick or in this case the number of sequential backticks + 1:
I am considering to add a commonmark compatible class however when I find the time for it.
This is one of those things that would be made easier with CommonMark compliance, but even without that as a goal seems like a bug to me.
Example
Babelmark
http://johnmacfarlane.net/babelmark2/?text=Please+remove+the+%60%5C%60+from+%60+%5C%60%60%60+%60%0A
Expected Output
Actual Output
Just a friendly report. I'm not trying to use cebe/markdown for this, just spotted it in the babelfish output while debugging something else. :)