Requesting facets returns unexpected results

Alex-Wood-CGI commented 9 years ago

Requesting the facets for a particular target returns unexpected results: motivations, domains of interest and organizations that do not match the annotations against that target, with some facets missing and other facets returned that shouldn't be, e.g.:

node_issue_suggest

antony-wilson commented 9 years ago

Please can you check that you are now getting back what you expect

Alex-Wood-CGI commented 9 years ago

Alas not… same as before.

From: Antony Wilson [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: 22 August 2014 09:27 To: cedadev/djcharme Cc: Wood, Alexander Subject: Re: [djcharme] Requesting facets returns unexpected results (#25)

Please can you check that you are now getting back what you expect

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cedadev/djcharme/issues/25#issuecomment-53035531.

antony-wilson commented 9 years ago

Could you paste the url you are looking at as it was a bit tricky copying it from an image and I may have made mistake. I am seeing different results from ports 8027 and 443

Alex-Wood-CGI commented 9 years ago

It happens for any target, but here’s an example: https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/suggest/atom?status=submitted&q=*&target=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8090%2FDAV%2FNASA%2FChlorophyl%2F2003%2FMY1DMM_CHLORA_2003-09.JPEG

From: Antony Wilson [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: 01 September 2014 14:29 To: cedadev/djcharme Cc: Wood, Alexander Subject: Re: [djcharme] Requesting facets returns unexpected results (#25)

Could you paste the url you are looking at as it was a bit tricky copying it from an image and I may have made mistake. I am seeing different results from ports 8027 and 443

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cedadev/djcharme/issues/25#issuecomment-54058926.

antony-wilson commented 9 years ago

looking at https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk:8027/suggest/atom?count=25&status=submitted&q=*&target=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8090%2FDAV%2FNASA%2FChlorophyl%2F2003%2FMY1DMM_CHLORA_2003-09.JPEG and comparing it to the triple store it looks ok to me

There are 7 annotations for this target: | http://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/513f629971944609a6eec12859c8966a | | http://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/65e5a3f02fe348b7b0bcd80de3ee9d62 | | http://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/dc398ac7778d46e694b561dff5c2e52f | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/012cae0a25e34409ba97b787c67350a6 | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/2a0629a7cdd14fe099a4f7e5716eb4a0 | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/63cadec1a21947eb92612b2f4ce6122c | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/b4f0de33505343b0b124a59d17da0818 |

Alex-Wood-CGI commented 9 years ago

It’s a port issue (you mentioned seeing different results on different ports) – it works on 8027, but only on 8027.

From: Antony Wilson [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: 02 September 2014 16:18 To: cedadev/djcharme Cc: Wood, Alexander Subject: Re: [djcharme] Requesting facets returns unexpected results (#25)

looking at https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk:8027/suggest/atom?count=25&status=submitted&q=*&target=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8090%2FDAV%2FNASA%2FChlorophyl%2F2003%2FMY1DMM_CHLORA_2003-09.JPEG and comparing it to the triple store it looks ok to me

There are 7 annotations for this target: | http://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/513f629971944609a6eec12859c8966a | | http://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/65e5a3f02fe348b7b0bcd80de3ee9d62 | | http://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/dc398ac7778d46e694b561dff5c2e52f | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/012cae0a25e34409ba97b787c67350a6 | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/2a0629a7cdd14fe099a4f7e5716eb4a0 | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/63cadec1a21947eb92612b2f4ce6122c | | https://charme-dev.cems.rl.ac.uk/resource/b4f0de33505343b0b124a59d17da0818 |

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cedadev/djcharme/issues/25#issuecomment-54167405.

antony-wilson commented 9 years ago

port 443 is iteration 4, it will get updated when everyone is happy with the lasest code port 8027 is the latest code moving towards iteration 5

To avoid confusion we will soon be putting these on seperate machines and improving the release process

antony-wilson commented 9 years ago

fixed in ieration 5

cedadev / djcharme

Requesting facets returns unexpected results #25