Open charliepascoe opened 3 years ago
I like that policy for the version number and am happy to adopt it.
Would <member_id>
be a separate directory for each ensemble member? Given that each ensemble member is a relatively short integration (~45 days) and we will have many of them, I'm inclined at the moment to put all members into the same leaf directory, and use initialization date instead as a higher level division. Say:
/snap/data/
There's also part of me that wants to flatten this a bit and remove the grid_label level since I don't anticipate there being many variants (and the information will be in the file names). But if experience shows that it's better to include it, I can accept that.
If we use Charlotte's initial suggestion, there should be 24 different possible experiments IDs, corresponding to each of the 4 planned variations of nudging, 3 different SSW events, and 2 different initialization dates for each event.
Peter - we only have two initialization dates, so the net effect of your suggestion is 12 different experiment IDs and two different initializations dates, right?
I don't see a major advantage either way.
I suggest we use the same pattern as the CMIP6 and CCMI-2022 archives e.g. /snap/data//////////
For ccmi-2022 we're using the date that data is uploaded to CEDA for the version number and we're asking users to create a version directory for this, so data uploaded on 26th March 2021 would have vv20210326