Closed timstableford closed 3 years ago
Do this solves the problem of #25? I was trying to do a different thing on my own in #27
Yep, solves #25 Hopefully the test shows how to accomplish with the current code what you were doing in #27
@timstableford Tested it here and now I could understand the idea. But maybe it should be cool to work out of the box, without needing to wrap the object. I made it in #27, but I'm not sure if it's okay, can you take a look?
Also added a demo of wrapping native JS classes
@ceifa Sorry for the bug, though hopefully this now resolves the original that had a memory leak and my one :)