Closed MSevey closed 9 months ago
PR Preview Action v1.4.4
:---:
:rocket: Deployed preview to https://celestiaorg.github.io/go-header/pr-preview/pr-111/
on branch gh-pages
at 2023-09-25 15:56 UTC
Merging #111 (d81ebc3) into main (ab6c2f5) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #111 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 69.68% 69.68%
=======================================
Files 37 37
Lines 2939 2939
=======================================
Hits 2048 2048
Misses 744 744
Partials 147 147
@vgonkivs @Wondertan @renaynay i am planning to add some rough specs this week. this PR is just adding the template/skeleton for it.
Another reason to have a repository template @MSevey
Another reason to have a repository template @MSevey
@Wondertan I'm not convinced a template repository is helpful. If anything it would add the additional step of needing to keep that template repo up to date with changes. For instance, if we had a template repo, we would still need to do this PR since you can't simply apply the template repo to an existing repo.
I could see a template repo being useful when the project is at the stage of many distributed teams building and contributing to different repos. Having the process of teams starting repos from a template would be helpful in ensuring consistency at the start. But even in that situation, naturally things will diverge and I'm not sure a template repo is the best process for maintaining best practices.
@MSevey, I thought Rollkit in this exact stage. There are new repos being created like go-da and celestia-da. As well as celestia will continue extracting common libs like for shares and blobs.
Overview
copying over the mdbooks spec structure from app and rollkit.
Checklist