Closed raphaelbastide closed 7 years ago
It's done. I can't push it because i've created a conflict in the branch... I've searched how to resolve this but it doesn't work so we'll see this on friday.
Ok see you on friday!
In case you want to give it a new try: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plm4x_DjDa8
I did it, I hope that everything is alright!
Anyway, this is my commit on style test : https://github.com/celiadzc/type-derivation/commit/74916e2cee782269c7df97676b04af08cb7fd3c2
I played with ratio, size and nodesep to make it more comfortable.
You can take a look here :
I can’t see the difference with the version I committed before.
After a quick check, the files ’type-derivation.dot’ I created and type-derivation
you created are totally similar. I will remove yours to keep the .dot
extention.
Because I think that I erased yours in committing. I'm clearly not happy to say that. A part of your edit with a look :
Maybe what I've done was not what you asked for.
You didn’t make anything wrong. The good thing with git is that you can always get things back from old version.
About the structure, I ask a question on StackOverflow. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36041176/restrict-graph-to-a-specific-format
Ok I'll check it. I tried monday to fix a size to the viz with page settings but it doesn't work. I'll do it again. I found some nice style on this page.
I found some nice style on this page.
Great resource, thanks.
Ok so now, the graph is settled in portrait. But indications of forks types are eaten by the ratio in the flow.
Try to find a good balance between
ratio
andsize
to get an optimal scrollable image. https://github.com/celiadzc/type-derivation/blob/master/type-derivation.dot#L4-L5