search

cellml / cellml-specification

CellML Specification
0 stars 8 forks source link

Add final URL to normative prologue #290

Closed kerimoyle closed 4 years ago

kerimoyle commented 4 years ago

... when we know what it is ...

MichaelClerx commented 4 years ago

@nickerso ?

hsorby commented 4 years ago

I'll have a crack at this again:

https://cellml.org/specifications/cellml_2.0/cellml_2_0_normative_specification.pdf
agarny commented 4 years ago

I guess I must have missed it, but do we really want to use a . for the cellml_2.0 bit and an _ for the PDF filename? I know that I was in favour of the underscore for the PDF filename, but seeing it in context, it looks a bit odd since we want/need to use . for the cellml_2.0 bit (to be consistent with previous versions of CellML). Argh, I am in two minds about this now.

Warning, warning, CellML Specification overload!

kerimoyle commented 4 years ago

I think it's better to avoid using . in URLs in general, so would rather have:

https://cellml.org/specification/cellml_2_0/cellml_2_0_normative_specification.pdf

It's a bit ugly though :|

agarny commented 4 years ago

The problem is that we already have https://cellml.org/specifications/cellml_1.0 and https://cellml.org/specification/cellml_1.1, so to have https://cellml.org/specification/cellml_2_0 would look really odd.

Actually, we have https://www.cellml.org/specifications/cellml_1.0 and https://www.cellml.org/specifications/cellml_1.1 (note the "www"!), which work fine but not https://cellml.org/specifications/cellml_1.0 and https://cellml.org/specification/cellml_1.1. IOW, there is no redirect to the www... Something for @nickerso or @metatoaster?

agarny commented 4 years ago

Oops, it's actually https://cellml.org/specifications/cellml_1.0 and https://cellml.org/specifications/cellml_1.1, and it should be https://cellml.org/specifications/cellml_2.0. IOW, "specifications", not "specification"!