Closed digitalextremist closed 10 years ago
I'm not really sure this addresses the problems. What if JRuby raised a TypeError internally?
I think the logic for deciding which implementation to use should happen ahead-of-time, not in a rescue block.
Also, I wouldn't worry too much as I plan on rewriting this all anyway ;)
I am fine with an unspecific domino effect, with one exception suppressed in the meantime.
Coverage remained the same when pulling 6871a434a413f8f1be8314012e6ac6fb850cfb90 on digitalextremist:patch-1 into fdd66442f65715e14e27910a01ce0d7ef971915d on celluloid:master.
I'm not really sure this addresses the problems. What if JRuby raised a TypeError internally?
I think the logic for deciding which implementation to use should happen ahead-of-time, not in a rescue block.
Also, I wouldn't worry too much as I plan on rewriting this all anyway ;)