Open HoneyryderChuck opened 10 years ago
It's not a rack app at the moment, but you could reimplement it on top of reel-rack
How exactly? The way I saw it, the DCell::Explorer is a a Reel::Server which takes directly a hostname and port. How could I pass the class to the rack app as in other implementations? Or by reimplementing, you meant I have to rewrite it/inherit from it and provide my own explorer so that it can become a rack app?
Sorry about this, maybe this should not be a dcell issue. Should I move this to reel-rack or google group?
If you want to run DCell::Explorer alongside other Rack apps, it needs to be rewritten as a Rack app and run atop Reel::Rack.
I'm not sure if this concerns dcell or reel, but I'd like to provide DCell Explorer web views under a certain namespace from my main rack app (using rack map for it). From what I've seen is the explorer not a rack app, but a reel server, which is by default not a rack app. But I've seen also that there is the reel-rack extension. How can I use this approach to expose the DCell::Explorer server an a map endpoint? An example of what I want to do: