Closed knewter closed 11 years ago
I think we'd need to evaluate the (backwards incompatible) API changes before merging this.
I think it would maybe make sense to have a separate Reel::SSLServer class which exposes the SSL-specific stuff, or perhaps an options hash to Reel::Server to pass in SSL-related parameters
:+1: for a Reel::SSLServer class.
I'll spike Reel::SSLServer
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Bernd Ahlers notifications@github.comwrote:
[image: :+1:] for a Reel::SSLServer class.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/celluloid/reel/pull/65#issuecomment-18760688 .
Josh Adams CTO | isotope|eleven http://www.isotope11.com cell 215-3957 work 476-8671 x201
Well, as it so happens I need SSL support in Reel myself and have a use case. I don't think this is a particularly useful start though, for a number of reasons. There's still no distinct SSLServer class in your PR, and you've changed the examples to only test the SSL path, instead of testing both.
I hope you don't mind but I'm going to pursue SSL support myself, trying to keep it isolated and tested separately from the non-SSL code
I'm not hurt by this. I was in a rush to get it functional and thought it might be helpful but in no way thought it was good :)
Also, would suggest you might still have to deal with the hanging sslsocket in jruby before it works there.
Thanks for all them things you do :) On Jun 13, 2013 8:14 PM, "Tony Arcieri" notifications@github.com wrote:
Well, as it so happens I need SSL support in Reel myself and have a use case. I don't think this is a particularly useful start though, for a number of reasons. There's still no distinct SSLServer class in your PR, and you've changed the examples to only test the SSL path, instead of testing both.
I hope you don't mind but I'm going to pursue SSL support myself, trying to keep it isolated and tested separately from the non-SSL code
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/celluloid/reel/pull/65#issuecomment-19432910 .
There's one failing test still, not sure what's up with it. Anything I should do differently here?