Closed karlb closed 1 year ago
Patch coverage: 66.55
% and project coverage change: +1.02
:tada:
Comparison is base (
71bdbcf
) 54.30% compared to head (de3f84b
) 55.32%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Coverage from tests in ./e2e_test/...
for ./consensus/istanbul/...
at commit d313f0aabc679e18a8fe9dc0e52e03a35fa2fa38
coverage: 59.8% of statements in consensus/istanbul coverage: 43.1% of statements in consensus/istanbul/announce coverage: 55.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/backendtest coverage: 24.3% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/internal/replica coverage: 63.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/core coverage: 50.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/db coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/proxy coverage: 64.4% of statements in consensus/istanbul/uptime coverage: 51.8% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator coverage: 79.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator/random
Since we want to wrap up the Gingerbread fork soo, we should start to depend on the branches in the monorepo which will eventually be used for the fork:
I also added the monorepo commits we depend on which have not been merged into the v10 contracts branch yet. See https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/tree/karlb/core-contracts.v10-ultragreen
So main part of this PR is actually in the changed monorepo commit and the changes to this repo are quite simple.