Closed gastonponti closed 1 year ago
Coverage from tests in ./e2e_test/...
for ./consensus/istanbul/...
at commit edbf300bbac9774edca2d856e09b10d88cb018ef
coverage: 63.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul coverage: 41.8% of statements in consensus/istanbul/announce coverage: 55.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/backendtest coverage: 24.3% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/internal/replica coverage: 61.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/core coverage: 50.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/db coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/proxy coverage: 64.4% of statements in consensus/istanbul/uptime coverage: 51.8% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator coverage: 79.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator/random
Test failures: | |
---|---|
TestEthersJSCompatibility: e2e_test
|
Patch coverage: 60.00%
and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
b7893f5
) 55.10% compared to head (755a9be
) 55.10%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
Block size limit CIP implementation of https://github.com/celo-org/celo-proposals/discussions/394 (number to be assigned)
Backwards compatibility
Part of the Gingerbread Part 2 Hard Fork