Closed jcortejoso closed 8 months ago
Coverage from tests in ./e2e_test/...
for ./consensus/istanbul/...
at commit 3a189b0d90c918e817f82230a37eb5605553c4c2
coverage: 63.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul coverage: 42.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/announce coverage: 55.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/backendtest coverage: 24.3% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/internal/replica coverage: 64.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/core coverage: 50.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/db coverage: 0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/proxy coverage: 64.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul/uptime coverage: 51.8% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator coverage: 79.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator/random
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
44c7490
) 55.09% compared to head (44e4e06
) 55.12%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
As pointed by @carterqw2 (🙏 ), celo-bls-go is not compatible with musl for amd64.
This PR aims to use glibc for amd64 image, and musl for arm64 images.