search

cemerick / austin

The ClojureScript browser-REPL rebuilt stronger, faster, easier.
510 stars 31 forks source link

help on none compilation option #43

Closed magomimmo closed 10 years ago

magomimmo commented 10 years ago

Hi Chas, I'm not able to make austin sample to work with the :none compilation. I did not find any information about austin non supporting it in the browser connected REPL scenario. It seems to me that austin has the same limitations of clojurescript.test about :none option. Is it true?
Have you any clue about it?

Thanks so much.

cemerick commented 10 years ago

The same limitation exists for the same reason. In this case, the output of the "app" compilation needs to be loaded by the browser (instead of e.g. phantomjs in the testing case). Perhaps there's a reliable way in this case to locate and preload the goog bits before loading the compilation output — it's somewhere in out, I think? — but I wouldn't want to recommend depending on anything in out. :simple (or :whitespace, whatever) just works.

magomimmo commented 10 years ago

thanks Chas. The limitation applies to piggieback too, isn't it?

cemerick commented 10 years ago

IIRC, :none can be used in REPL environments, but I honestly don't recall.

Is all of this interest in :none just re: TDD cycle time?

magomimmo commented 10 years ago

On Jan 26, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Chas Emerick notifications@github.com wrote:

IIRC, :none can be used in REPL environments, but I honestly don't recall.

ok. I'll try myself next week. Is all of this interest in :none just re: TDD cycle time?

mostly yes. I just read you comment on clojurescript.test. Comparing your numbers with mine it seems that my cljs-start template does something wrong, otherwise I wouldn't know how to justify the difference itself, even if I'm on an old iMac. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.