Closed sgrayban closed 6 months ago
yep, I noticed this too. I'll add a command to do this
Thanks !
ntp-demo1.centerclick.com> ntppool validate -4
To verify this server with the NTP Pool, visit
https://manage.ntppool.org/manage/server/verify/xxxxxxxx
2024-03-10 17:12:22 URL:https://validate4.ntppool.dev/p/ [106/106] -> "-" [1]
ntp-demo1.centerclick.com> ntppool validate -6
To verify this server with the NTP Pool, visit
https://manage.ntppool.org/manage/server/verify/xxxxxxxx
2024-03-10 17:12:54 URL:https://validate6.ntppool.dev/p/ [106/106] -> "-" [1]
ntp-demo1.centerclick.com>
hmm getting a error for the 6
clock.borgnet.us> ntppool validate -6 https://validate6.ntppool.dev/p/: 2024-03-12 14:35:11 ERROR 404: Not Found.
the host pings and traces fine
https://validate6.ntppool.dev/p/ gives you a 404 if no validation is pending
But it is
I wonder if the ntp device is binding to a different ipv6
2603:3023:3e4:c900::ae3e/128
2603:3023:3e4:c900:70f7:75ff:fed6:d6d4/64
fe80::70f7:75ff:fed6:d6d4/64
The second 6 is the one it should be binding to
Yup that's the issue -- its binding to the first 6 address which is is right but wrong also -- my block is the /64 not the /128
I don't know how to fix this..
The 1st address is the address assigned by your DHCPv6 server and takes precidence over the EUI64 based address for outbound connections. And yes it should be a /128, that's just how DHCPv6 works. I could add another arg to the command to bind to an arbitrary address, but the address selection is doing the right thing given the 2 available choices. DHCPv6 is just higher priority.
Ok