centsol / adw-launcher-android

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/adw-launcher-android
0 stars 0 forks source link

HIGH CPU usage #165

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install ADW from market
2. set as default launcher using "Home Switcher" app
3. watch CPU usage via "Android System Info" app

What version of the product are you using? On what phone? What Android
version?
ADW.Launcher 1.1.5 standalone
Samsung Galaxy SGH-I897 (ATT Captivate)
Andoroid 2.1-update1 (ECLAIR)

Please provide any additional information below.
Using ADW.Launcher as my default launcher, and I love it!  A while after a 
system start-up I will notice some of my apps, as well as ADW itself, will 
begin to shudder or respond slowly.  I open the Android System Info app, switch 
to the TASKS tab, and sort by CPU.  I notice the top TWO threads pegged at 100% 
CPU.
Both threads are listed as "android.process.acore", Package: org.adw.launcher.  
The threads also have the same Process ID.

Please let me know if there is any other information I can give you to help.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by gacan...@gmail.com on 11 Sep 2010 at 6:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I believe the pegged CPU and two threads has to do with the Home action.

When I'm running another app, and instead of using the "exit/curl-back" button 
on the phone, I use the Home button.  Since I have more than one launcher 
downloaded, I am presented with a prompt asking which launcher to use.  I 
always 'set default' then choose ADW.Launcher (for whatever reason, I still get 
prompted for future home clicks).  

Could this "confusion" be spawning another thread?  Perhaps it's causing some 
sort've lock-contention for system files, etc?

Original comment by gacan...@gmail.com on 14 Sep 2010 at 2:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
http://code.google.com/p/adw-launcher-android/issues/detail?id=111

this link seems to describe the same issue of having to choose the home button 
again, but without the cpu spike reported.

Original comment by gacan...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2010 at 1:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
There really is no need to use a third party app "home switcher" to change home 
apps.
This is probably causing your high CPU use.

Please uninstall the "home switcher" and follow these steps:

The proper way to clear and "switch" without any third party app is to go to 
Settings > Manage Applications > ADW.Launcher and select clear default.

Pressing home will now present a prompt to choose your home..

Please report back using these steps.

Original comment by klinster...@gmail.com on 23 Oct 2010 at 8:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Agreed: I do not use "home switcher" any longer.

I still see two threads, with same PID, spiked at 100% in the Android System 
Info app.
Does this seem normal then?

I'm not sure if Android System Info (ASI) is reporting this correctly.  I tried 
another app to show CPU usage on the notifications bar.  It sits very low, if 
not idle, even when ASI indicates 100% CPU -- weird.

Original comment by gacan...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2010 at 3:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Using ADW Launcher 1.2.0 CPU usage is much higher than without; it won't reach 
100% overall CPU usage but AndroidSystemInfo shows 2 processes with 100% CPU:
PID 2746  UserID 10010  background  org.adw.launcher  22.98mb

I tried LauncherPro before using ADW Launcher but that app caused a 100% CPU 
usage on my phone. So maybe it's something with the phone using alternative 
home replacements...

Samsung Galaxy 3 I5800 with Eclair2.1 (root)

Original comment by tm2...@googlemail.com on 14 Nov 2010 at 12:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I do not use a homeswitcher mod... just adwlauncher as default for home and 
return buttons.

I have two processes using nearly 50 mb memory and 100% cpu (system info pro).

process - android.process.acore
threads - 10
package name - org.adwfreak.launcher

nexus s
android 2.3.1
kern 2.6.35.7
build GRH78

Original comment by jessdf...@gmail.com on 6 Jan 2011 at 12:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Having the exact same problems with two android phones. Tried two different 
launchers and the exact same thing is happening with both (two instances of 
android.process.acore goes to 100% usage).

Tried both with launcher pro as well as adw launcher.

The two phones i've tried with are
ZTE Blade running stock 2.1
HTC Desire running stock 2.2

Original comment by dome...@gmail.com on 13 Feb 2011 at 5:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I also am using ADW EX and have the same issue - two .acore processes with 
org.adwfreak.launcher at 100% CPU.  I used to have the home switcher app but 
removed it.  I still have the stock launcher loaded.  Is it safe to remove that 
or "freeze" it with Titanium backup and would that help?

Original comment by rmdri...@gmail.com on 18 Apr 2011 at 10:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Same problem,
Xperia x10 MINI running 2.1 , upgrade from Sony Ericsson web.
With the stock launcher every thing is OK, but I try ADW / Launcher Pro / Go 
Launcher and this 3 launchers have same issue.
two android.process.acore using 100% cpu.

This happens only if wifi is active (I try to disable all syncs and the same 
problem happens)

If I open 3 launchers I can see 3 android.process.acore running, so every time 
I try a launcher I kill all of the android.process.acore process.

I don't know why, but it'll be really useful to use a custom launcher because 
the default launcher is really bad.

Federico
(Sorry for my English, I'm from Argentina)

Original comment by sk8feder...@gmail.com on 4 May 2011 at 4:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hi guys,
I can confirm a similar issue with what seems all 3rd party launchers including 
adw.
I have not seen two processes but when a 3rd party launcher runs as acore the 
cpu does appear to be under more load than it would otherwise be. I use a 
samsung galaxy S GT-I9000 and while idling on the home screen with a cpu 
monitoring set running I get a regular 100% cpu while the cpu is clocked to 
200mhz. The internal samsung Touchwiz launcher (twlauncher) when in use as it 
would be the cpu runs at 100mhz at about 10% utilisation at that frequency.

This phone is running android 2.3.3 stock firmware. Please contact me if there 
is any additional information I can provide.

Original comment by netsu...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2011 at 6:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
is my problem in x10 xperia android 2.3 

Original comment by marceloh...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2011 at 4:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I am also experiencing high CPU usage. I am on a Samsung Epic 4g (Samsung 
Galaxys S for Sprint), rooted but stock everything else and I find CPU usage 
spikes any time I use the home button from an application. The high-er end, or 
HD apps make it worse (especially out of games like Angry Birds, or Plants vs. 
Zombie) or any time I change setting in ADW EX. I usually have to open the 
standard task manager (that comes up when long-pressing home button and 
selecting task manager), sometimes the CPU spikes for a good 5 mintues into the 
red-zone, making my phone virtually unuseable during that time. 
I am currently running Froyo, 2.2

Original comment by PokeAshe...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 4:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Saw this problem on a Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc. 

It had Gingerbread 2.3.8 with ADW Launcher and everything was fine. 

When it was upgraded to ICS 4.0.4, com.google.media and com.google.acore 
started eating up most of the CPU time. Searching Google for the .media, the 
advice was to search /mnt/sdcard/media/audio/ for ringtones and delete them. I 
did not have any ringtones there, but did have one notification for facebook. I 
deleted it, and it helped a bit.

After that .media continued to eat CPU time. Only after I killed Xperia Gallery 
using Automatic Task Killer (ATK) did the phone go back to normal, and neither 
.acore nor .media were eating up CPU.

Here is the output of top -n 7, either from adb shell or from ConnectBot.

While com.google.media is eating CPU
User 55%, System 12%, IOW 32%, IRQ 0%
User 56 + Nice 116 + Sys 38 + Idle 0 + IOW 100 + IRQ 0 + SIRQ 0 = 310

  PID PR CPU% S  #THR     VSS     RSS PCY UID      Name
  456  0  44% S    16 292200K  17956K  bg app_26   android.process.media
 2456  0  11% S    23 295108K  14484K  bg app_87   com.sonyericsson.gallery
  310  0   4% S    76 390468K  35008K  fg system   system_server
 3403  0   1% R     1    924K    448K  fg shell    top
  114  0   0% S     1      0K      0K  fg root     yaffs-bg-1
  140  0   0% S     3  28024K   1192K  fg drm      /system/bin/drmserver
  111  0   0% D     1      0K      0K  fg root     mmcqd

While both com.google.acore and com.google.acore is eating CPU
User 83%, System 10%, IOW 6%, IRQ 0%
User 40 + Nice 214 + Sys 33 + Idle 0 + IOW 19 + IRQ 0 + SIRQ 0 = 306

  PID PR CPU% S  #THR     VSS     RSS PCY UID      Name
  612  0  29% S    17 297168K  21596K  bg app_23   android.process.acore
  456  0  28% S    16 292200K  18064K  bg app_26   android.process.media
 3132  0  24% S    21 299632K  30064K  bg app_23   com.sonyericsson.android.socialphonebook
 2456  0   3% S    16 287828K  15000K  bg app_87   com.sonyericsson.gallery
  310  0   2% S    76 390468K  37596K  fg system   system_server
 2670  0   1% S    10 286736K  38716K  fg app_11   android.process.acore
 3203  0   1% R     1    924K    448K  fg shell    top

After .acore stops eating CPU

User 0%, System 2%, IOW 0%, IRQ 0%
User 1 + Nice 0 + Sys 9 + Idle 296 + IOW 0 + IRQ 0 + SIRQ 0 = 306

  PID PR CPU% S  #THR     VSS     RSS PCY UID      Name
 5614  0   1% R     1    928K    460K  fg shell    top
  393  0   1% S    12 291432K  25576K  fg system   com.android.systemui
    3  0   0% S     1      0K      0K  fg root     ksoftirqd/0
    4  0   0% S     1      0K      0K  fg root     events/0
    5  0   0% S     1      0K      0K  fg root     khelper
    6  0   0% S     1      0K      0K  fg root     async/mgr
    7  0   0% S     1      0K      0K  fg root     suspend

Original comment by kba...@gmail.com on 23 Aug 2012 at 12:44