Open m-mohr opened 6 months ago
Thanks for pointing this out. It is an oversight from our side. Will revise SAR Req 2.1 to use the terminology of 1.2 in the next (dot) update of the SAR PFS.
And by the way, Matthias - thanks for tagging me. Please continue doing so for any SAR labeled topic. I've also copied in @johntruckenbrodt who also will be helpful in developing the SAR STAC profice
SAR Req. 1.2 says:
SAR Req. 2.1 says:
Why is this different?
I think it could make sense to update SAR Req 2.1 to use the terminology of 1.2.
cc @akerosenqvist (tagging you here because you offered to help with the STAC Radar profile. If you want me to not tag you, please let me know)