ErnestaP
commented
1 year ago No, we don't have any specific value for affiliations, if they don't exist.
In some records, we don't have any affiliations, these records might be changed/added manually We have 73 records without affiliations: The following data is presented in the format: (record_id: DOI), from the oldest (the year of 2014) record to the newest one (the year of 2023).
[(654, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.12.014'),
(2444, 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.011'),
(2997, 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.040'),
(3196, 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.052'),
(4192, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/051'),
(5155, 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.12.020'),
(8864, 10.1155/2015/893920'),
(9272, 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.023'),
(9990, 10.1155/2015/975023'),
(10833, 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.058'),
(12818, 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.065'),
(15122, 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.010'),
(15266, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.04.024'),
(15535, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.04.046'),
(16212, 10.1088/1674-1137/40/7/073101'),
(16472, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.07.013'),
(17015, 10.1088/1674-1137/40/9/093102'),
(17648, 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.004'),
(17735, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.08.023'),
(18590, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/1/013104'),
(19069, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/2/023101'),
(19625, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/4/043103'),
(20008, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/5/053101'),
(20440, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063103'),
(20989, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/8/083107'),
(20992, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/8/083103'),
(21407, 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.076'),
(21435, 10.1088/1674-1137/41/9/094104'),
(21896, 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.084'),
(22903, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.12.019'),
(40962, 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.057'),
(43706, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.096012'),
(48902, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.059902'),
(49101, 10.1093/ptep/ptz061'),
(54869, 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064905'),
(60073, 10.1093/ptep/ptaa175'),
(67452, 10.1088/1674-1137/ac0b3b'),
(73304, 10.1093/ptep/ptac123'),
(75175, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.031901'),
(75248, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.012003'),
(75330, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.012006'),
(75582, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.032001'),
(75611, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.033003'),
(75737, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.032003'),
(75764, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.032004'),
(75766, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.032005'),
(75824, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071802'),
(75825, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L031101'),
(75853, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071804'),
(75900, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.032008'),
(75914, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L031103'),
(75957, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L031102'),
(76074, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.032013'),
(76183, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.091902'),
(76242, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052001'),
(76297, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052004'),
(76615, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052009'),
(76726, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051101'),
(76850, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.072001'),
(76871, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.072002'),
(76969, 10.1088/1674-1137/acc3f4'),
(76987, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.151903'),
(77316, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.072008'),
(77360, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.181803'),
(77363, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.181804'),
(77405, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.092001'),
(77500, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.092003'),
(77637, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L091102'),
(78121, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.231801'),
(78594, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.261802'),
(78595, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.112009'),
(78596, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.112011'),
(78615, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.112010')]For DEVELOPERS: Affiliations assigning:
APS :https://github.com/SCOAP3/hepcrawl/blob/master/hepcrawl/extractors/aps_parser.py#L110 Hindawi: https://github.com/SCOAP3/hepcrawl/blob/master/hepcrawl/extractors/hindawi_parser.py#L67C8-L67C8 IOP: https://github.com/SCOAP3/hepcrawl/blob/master/hepcrawl/extractors/jats.py#L95C6-L95C6 OUP: https://github.com/SCOAP3/hepcrawl/blob/master/hepcrawl/extractors/jats.py#L95 Elsevier: https://github.com/SCOAP3/hepcrawl/blob/master/hepcrawl/extractors/s3_elsevier_parser.py#L187 Springer: https://github.com/SCOAP3/hepcrawl/blob/master/hepcrawl/extractors/s3_springer_parser.py#L155
It happens rarely that authors don't have affiliation. But the affiliation field is mandatory. It is the case for 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116279 which is Halted status because of the missing affiliation. Are there similar cases already in the repo? Do we have a specific value we use in the affiliated field?