Some first observations

[suenjedt]

Some very first comments. I am fully aware that some of this you would have fixed anyway, but I wanted to mention anyway. More to come while playing with it... Thanks, looks like a big step forward!

Entry page

• [x] some font issues, on Anxhela's PC we had some CERIF fonts on the entry page for headers
• [x] please put all logos at the bottom
• [x] about us page, provided by Anxhela
• [ ] "Welcome to CERN Analysis Preservation"
• [ ] drop down on the right side of the search box is nice, we need to decide on wording there (not "CAP"). Maybe the external user testing will help us refining that part.
• [ ] the search box in the top needs to be tested thoroughly. Not convinced it is the right place. Again, this should be tested externally.
• [x] "Hello from angular" needs to be removed. A time stamp is certainly helpful though, i.e. "when did I log in the last time". But not too important.
• [x] "update time"?
• [x] nothing happens when I click on "update records"

CMS Records

• [ ] once you enter/open a record you dont know anymore where you are ["am I editing a CMS record?". Could you just put the collab logo there? [or sth like breadcrumbs, but that might not work with the simple IA right now]
• [ ] "serialize"?

CMS Survey

• [ ] CMS survey needs to integrate the correction made by Anxhela. (Next external testing.)
• [ ] Some quesitons have shaded boxes, other dont.
• [ ] Split the sentence or add an "and" , "Take a second read the FAQ"
• [ ] CMS record form: all bold fonts are hard to read (blurry?)
• [ ] In the 'analysis record' section, there are lots of "this field is not optional" sentences. Can we remove them somehow?

LHCb records

• [ ] there should be an empty box for providing the path for MC, data, software etc. so that no extra click is needed.

[suenjedt]

• [ ] please remove the "portal" in the welcome message.
• [ ] please harmonize the welcome message in the individual collabs collections ["Welcome to CMS/ATLAS/ALICE/LHCb Analysis Preservation"]

[suenjedt]

I think this can be closed - as the issues above are either done or superseeded by the "real" testing within the collaborations.