Closed enidgjoleka closed 3 years ago
As per https://github.com/uwiger/parse_trans/pull/44#issuecomment-774344538:
"
.idea -> needed for developers who work intelliJ Idea
Shouldn't developers who use this, include the exception in their own .gitignore_global
? To me, .gitignore
was always about files that the application itself might generate, e.g. logs
, _build
, rebar3.crashdump
, ...
"
I'd apply the same reasoning as with the .DS_Store
, for example (generated in Mac).
(imagine we add exceptions for all editors...)
Also, ebin/
is for rebar
2. Still valid to use, but not the one erlang-certifi
aims for.
I will remove the .idea
entry.
As I mentioned on the other PR: https://github.com/uwiger/parse_trans/pull/44#issuecomment-774920967
the system I am working on is quite old and does not make use of rebar3 yet.
Hence, we need to deal with ebin
.
Hence, we need to deal with ebin.
Sure, ebin
is reasonable, which is why I wrote "Also, ebin/ is for rebar 2. Still valid to use, but not the one erlang-certifi aims for.".
Hi @paulo-ferraz-oliveira I was wondering if there is anything left in this PR that might stop it from being merged. If so please let me know and I would be happy to work on it.
Thanks.
Hi, @enidgjoleka. I don't think there is anything missing, apart from the approval and merging by @benoitc.
merged. Sorry for the delay.
This PR adds one more entry on .gitignore: