It is certainly a good idea to define an order. The data itself should already be in alphabetic order AFAIK.
What if the order should be different? In the past we have actually put the generic collectors and parsers in front of the vendor-specific ones.
Thank you for the proposal!
It is certainly a good idea to define an order. The data itself should already be in alphabetic order AFAIK. What if the order should be different? In the past we have actually put the generic collectors and parsers in front of the vendor-specific ones.
What do others think?