Closed robcza closed 8 years ago
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 01:44:12PM -0700, Robert Šefr wrote:
I'd like to extend list of types for taxonomy "Malicious Code" and add the type "unwanted software". I'm not able to use any of existing types to describe this type. Do you agree with such a change?
While I agree with the need for such a category, it will overlap with "Malicious Code".
I'd rather see this change "upstream" in the eCSIRT II Taxonomy (https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/csirt-cert-services/community-projects/existing-taxonomies)
I suggest we talk with Cosmin (@cokebottle ) on this .
My 2 cents, a.
subscribe the Aaron words.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:15 AM, AaronK notifications@github.com wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 01:44:12PM -0700, Robert Šefr wrote:
I'd like to extend list of types for taxonomy "Malicious Code" and add the type "unwanted software". I'm not able to use any of existing types to describe this type. Do you agree with such a change?
While I agree with the need for such a category, it will overlap with "Malicious Code".
I'd rather see this change "upstream" in the eCSIRT II Taxonomy ( https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/csirt-cert-services/community-projects/existing-taxonomies )
I suggest we talk with Cosmin (@cokebottle ) on this .
My 2 cents, a.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/certtools/intelmq/issues/520#issuecomment-219335023
Tomás Lima* , * »-«* SYNchroACK *»-«
@robcza can we solve this "upstream" with ENISA/ the taxonomy standardisation group? If yes, I'll close this issue here and we will then update the intelmq taxonomy once, our upstream eCSIRT II taxonomy gets updated. okay with you?
Yes, I agree. Should keep it compliant.
I'd like to extend list of types for taxonomy "Malicious Code" and add the type "unwanted software". I'm not able to use any of existing types to describe this type. Do you agree with such a change?