Original report on BitBucket by Darren Bell (GitHub: darrenbell2).
In DDI-C, resInstru field is meant to be used for DDI Research Instrument vocabulary. If this is used this purpose, it cannot be mandatory, not all datasets have instrument attached.
Description is quite likely not correct.
Source of comment:
From: Katja Moilanen (Basecamp) [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Sent: 30 November 2021 11:41
To: Bell, Darren S [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Subject: Re: (CESSDA Metadata Office) Your feedback on the new DDI profile drafts (CDC and EQB) is needed!
please find attached to this message the FSD's feedback on the EQB DDI 2.5 profile. It includes general comments about the profile as well as information about FSD's capability to produce "EQB valid" DDI 2.5 metadata.
Best wishes,
Katja
Original report on BitBucket by Darren Bell (GitHub: darrenbell2).
In DDI-C, resInstru field is meant to be used for DDI Research Instrument vocabulary. If this is used this purpose, it cannot be mandatory, not all datasets have instrument attached.
Description is quite likely not correct.
Source of comment:
From: Katja Moilanen (Basecamp) [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Sent: 30 November 2021 11:41
To: Bell, Darren S [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Subject: Re: (CESSDA Metadata Office) Your feedback on the new DDI profile drafts (CDC and EQB) is needed!
please find attached to this message the FSD's feedback on the EQB DDI 2.5 profile. It includes general comments about the profile as well as information about FSD's capability to produce "EQB valid" DDI 2.5 metadata.
Best wishes,
Katja