Original report on BitBucket by Darren Bell (GitHub: darrenbell2).
Why 2 different IDs for the question are needed? Would it be enought just to have //qstn/@ID (see previous issue)
If ExtLlink is used, it is mandatory to have attribute URI in it.
Source of comment:
From: Katja Moilanen (Basecamp) [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Sent: 30 November 2021 11:41
To: Bell, Darren S [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Subject: Re: (CESSDA Metadata Office) Your feedback on the new DDI profile drafts (CDC and EQB) is needed!
please find attached to this message the FSD's feedback on the EQB DDI 2.5 profile. It includes general comments about the profile as well as information about FSD's capability to produce "EQB valid" DDI 2.5 metadata.
Best wishes,
Katja
Original report on BitBucket by Darren Bell (GitHub: darrenbell2).
Why 2 different IDs for the question are needed? Would it be enought just to have //qstn/@ID (see previous issue)
If ExtLlink is used, it is mandatory to have attribute URI in it.
Source of comment:
From: Katja Moilanen (Basecamp) [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Sent: 30 November 2021 11:41
To: Bell, Darren S [email address removed](mailto:email address removed)
Subject: Re: (CESSDA Metadata Office) Your feedback on the new DDI profile drafts (CDC and EQB) is needed!
please find attached to this message the FSD's feedback on the EQB DDI 2.5 profile. It includes general comments about the profile as well as information about FSD's capability to produce "EQB valid" DDI 2.5 metadata.
Best wishes,
Katja