Open lucaswerkmeister opened 6 years ago
On the other hand… Ceylon isn’t Java. I don’t have the impression that there are chances of a different, independent compiler for Ceylon coming up anytime soon. So perhaps it would make sense to ignore the vendor and just talk about “the compiler AST”. Does that sound reasonable?
Yes, definitely.
and then a truffle / graal AST ?
Referring to the compiler as “the RedHat compiler” doesn’t really work anymore, following the migration to the Eclipse foundation. Do we call just say “Eclipse” instead now (e. g. “an Eclipse AST
AndOp
”)? Or is there some better name we can use?Scope:
ceylon.ast.redhat
,test.ceylon.ast.redhat
module namesRedHatTransformer
class nameceylon.ast.redhat
andtest.ceylon.ast.redhat
README