cf-convention / vocabularies

Issues and source files for CF controlled vocabularies
3 stars 1 forks source link

difference between area types "ice_sheet" and "land_ice" #192

Closed taylor13 closed 1 year ago

taylor13 commented 2 years ago

I must be missing something obvious, but the area types table includes:

land_ice: "Land ice" means glaciers, ice-caps, grounded ice sheets resting on bedrock and floating ice-shelves. and ice_sheet: An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and ice shelves flowing over the ocean, but excludes ice-caps and glaciers (in contrast to land_ice, which includes all components).

I would have thought if we needed both of these, the two descriptions would have been reversed (i.e., land_ice, not ice_sheet would exclude ice-caps and glaciers.

Can someone explain why the terminology is appropriate?

JonathanGregory commented 2 years ago

The area type table is consistent with the use of these words in IPCC and Earth system modelling, I would say. "Land ice" is the general term for ice which is made from snowfall on land (including on land ice), distinguishing it from "sea ice", which is made of frozen seawater and snowfall on sea ice. The distinction between the types of land ice body (ice sheet, icecap and glacier) is a bit vague and is essentially to do with size. A glacier is comparatively small and mostly confined by bedrock topography, whose form strongly affects its surface topography. An ice sheet is so large that it buries the bedrock topography, and its surface topography is mostly determined by surface mass balance and ice dynamics. An icecap is something intermediate in size. There are only two ice sheets in the modern world viz on Greenland and on Antarctica (where East and West are sometimes regarded as distinct) but there are at least 200e3 glaciers.

taylor13 commented 2 years ago

thanks for the clarification. My confusion primarily stemmed from thinking of a cap as an ice sheet covering the "top of the earth" (i.e., one of the poles). Obviously, incorrect.

There is perhaps a small tweak I might suggest, however. To make the distinction cleaner, could we exclude from "ice_sheet) not only ice caps and glaciers, but also the ice shelves associated with them? It seems odd to me to include the ice_shelf attached to a glacier but not the glacier itself. Of course, the ice shelves associated with a proper ice_sheet would be included in the "ice_sheet" type.

JonathanGregory commented 2 years ago

Ah, I see. Yes, "ice cap" is sometimes used to mean polar sea ice, isn't it. "Ice sheet" includes both grounded ice and ice shelves, as the current text correctly says. People often write phrases like "grounded ice sheet" when they want to clarify that ice shelves should be excluded.

taylor13 commented 2 years ago

Yes, I know Ice_sheet includes both grounded ice and ice shelves, but it doesn't say it only includes the ice shelves connected to the ice sheet. I misinterpreted the description as including both ice shelves attached to the ice_sheet and also ice shelves attached to any other land ice (e.g., attached to glaciers). I think the ice shelves attached to glaciers should be explicitly excluded. The current description is:

ice_sheet: An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and ice shelves flowing over the ocean, but excludes ice-caps and glaciers (in contrast to land_ice, which includes all components).

Could we revise this to:

ice_sheet: An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and any ice shelves flowing over the ocean that are attached to it, but it excludes ice-caps and glaciers (in contrast to land_ice, which includes all components).

I suppose most would not have misinterpreted what we currently have, but I, for one, did.

JonathanGregory commented 2 years ago

Dear Karl

Ah, thanks, I see what you mean now. Yes, I agree, that would be useful to clarify. Maybe to be even more explicit we could say "but it excludes ice-caps and glaciers and any floating ice shelves and ice tongues attached to them".

Best wishes

Jonathan

taylor13 commented 2 years ago

I would be happy with that. Thanks.

JonathanGregory commented 2 years ago

Dear Alison @japamment et al.

As discussed in this issue, Karl and I propose that the definition for the ice_sheet area type should be clarified, to read

An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and any ice shelves flowing over the ocean that are attached to grounded ice sheets. The ice_sheet area excludes ice-caps and glaciers and any floating ice shelves and ice tongues attached to them, but the land_ice area includes those as well the ice_sheet area.

Here, I've rephrased the last part, hoping to make it even clearer.

Best wishes

Jonathan

taylor13 commented 2 years ago

Seems clear to me now. Thanks, Jonathan and Alison.

JonathanGregory commented 2 years ago

Thanks for raising the issue, Karl.

feggleton commented 2 years ago

That clarification seems sensible. Thanks.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue has had no activity in the last 30 days. This is a reminder to please comment on standard name requests to assist with agreement and acceptance. Standard name moderators are also reminded to review @feggleton @japamment

japamment commented 1 year ago

@taylor13 @JonathanGregory

Thanks for clarifying the ice_sheet area type definition - anything we can do to make meanings clear and unambiguous is always an improvement!

I will make this change in the area type table update this week.

Best wishes

Alison

japamment commented 1 year ago

I am closing this ticket as the proposed change has been published in V11 of the area type table.