cf-convention / vocabularies

Issues and source files for CF controlled vocabularies
3 stars 1 forks source link

CMIP7 Standard names: lake_area_fraction #222

Open christian-stepanek opened 1 month ago

christian-stepanek commented 1 month ago

Christian Stepanek

2024-09-12

For each term please try to give the following:

- Proposed term to appear in the vocabulary lake_area_fraction

- Description: This is similar to land_area_fraction etc. but shall describe the fraction of lake coverage on a grid cell. It appears that there is not yet a name for the fraction of a grid cell covered by lakes. This is relevant for, e.g., PMIP, where differences in lake cover must be quantified.

- Unit: Fraction

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Thank you for your proposal. These terms will be added to the cfeditor (http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1) shortly. Your proposal will then be reviewed and commented on by the community and Standard Names moderator.

taylor13 commented 1 month ago

There is related (duplicate?) discussion in https://github.com/cf-convention/vocabularies/issues/65 . I think somewhere we've decided that the way to handle specific area type fractions in the future is through adding that area type to the area type table and then attaching a scalar dimension to the area fraction variable. It's standard name would simply be "area_fraction". Will try to fill in more details later.

martinjuckes commented 1 month ago

I agree with Karl, in CMIP6 we added many area fractions in this way (e.g. for bare soil, grass, C3 grass, C4 grass, broadleaf deciduous trees, etc).

We would need a new lake term in the area type table

efisher008 commented 3 weeks ago

Dear all,

Thank you Christian @christian-stepanek for your proposal. As @taylor13 and @martinjuckes have responded, this would ideally be handled by a new lake term in the area type table as has been mentioned in the discussion in issue #65 and utilising the dimensionality of the area fraction variable to achieve this. Do you have further questions on this? It sounds as though @taylor13 is happy to give some further clarification around how this would work if so.

Best wishes, Ellie