Closed mouse0270 closed 2 years ago
While technically possible, it also adds quite a bit of complexity to the underlying code.
given that the goal of this project is to be simple and feature-lite, I’m not sure the benefits of supporting Set() and Map() are worth that added complexity.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense, using an object is all that bad, I just like to use Maps and Sets over objects when I can. However, I understand that it would add a lot of complexity to support them. So that makes complete sense.
Would it be possible to add the ability to use a
Map
or aSet
as a store in a future version? It appears stores are limited to justArray
orObject
.