Closed cfhammill closed 2 years ago
Fortunately we have been rejected. Uwe wants us to fix up the description and add a bit more explanation. This is fortunate because we can now change the name in time for first release
Yet another rejection, this time for slightly more substantive reasons. Uwe has requested that we:
Obviously number three is the most serious. But a reasonable request.
I think we're fortunate again here, our first release will have map_l
which is kind of necessary.
A few more docs needed, finished all base-lenses.R (except unlist_l), all array-lenses.R, all dataframe-lenses.R (except transpose_l), all lens.R (except oscope but not bothering there). Remains to be done, verbs.R and text-lenses.R
@bcdarwin Any outstanding (high-priority) issues before resubmission?
Nothing on my end ... what about version %>% over(last_l, x ~ x + 1)
?
Good call. I want to finish the filepath lenses, but oh goodness are they ever corner-cases galore, the other part of me wants to scrap them all and save them for a future release.
Points to your idea - just write a parser for filepaths, regex is too tricky.
Submission in progress. Auto checks all passed. Waiting on manual review