Closed anselmbradford closed 9 years ago
Because that line of code goes back almost two years to well before cf-enhancements existed :)
I don't think it needs to be made an official color. It only really has one use: active state on destructive actions.
Because that line of code goes back almost two years to well before cf-enhancements existed :)
I don't think it needs to be made an official color. It only really has one use: active state on destructive actions.
Kind of sounds like it already is an official color if it's in use for two years? What makes a color "official" vs not?
What makes a color "official" vs not?
Whether or not it appears here: http://cfpb.github.io/design-manual/identity/color-principles.html
Ahh, would it make sense to have https://github.com/cfpb/generator-cf/blob/master/app/templates/src/static/css/brand-palette.less#L6 link to that?
Yeah, it would. Good call! Should've revisited that when the Design Manual was released.
What's the canonical source of brand-palette.less
? Is it this repo?
I believe so; see also: cf-theme-overrides.less
.
@dark-redorange
is listed as an// Unofficial or proposed colors
in https://github.com/cfpb/generator-cf/blob/master/app/templates/src/static/css/brand-palette.less#L30Shouldn't it be in https://github.com/cfpb/generator-cf/blob/master/app/templates/src/static/css/cf-enhancements.less instead?
Also, what's the migration path to make it an official color?