Closed jmarin closed 9 years ago
Checking this out now. Reading up on ScalaTest's Property-based Testing and Generator-driven Property Checks.
Review complete. Overall looks good, though I think we should fix the Travis log spew issue before merging.
Travis is certainly much happier now. However, there are still a considerable number or ERROR
s being logged related to SearchUtilsSpec
.
There's about 50 entries that look like:
[2015-08-26 18:20:22,642][ERROR][pool-7-thread-9-ScalaTest-running-SearchUtilsSpec] For input string: "C"
[2015-08-26 18:20:22,643][ERROR][pool-7-thread-9-ScalaTest-running-SearchUtilsSpec] For input string: "B"
...and nearly 100 that look like:
[2015-08-26 18:20:22,738][ERROR][pool-7-thread-9-ScalaTest-running-SearchUtilsSpec] For input string: ""
I don't quite understand what these mean. It seems like an error logged from the internals of ScalaTest or ScalaCheck. The tests themselves all pass, and this error does not seem related to our own error logging when unparsable strings are passed in.
@jmarin, thoughts?
Nevermind. I must have been looking at a previous build or something. I don't see the above-mentioned errors in the latest Travis build. Merging...
Accounts for address ranges that are not numeric. So far the following cases have been contemplated as per the TIGER/Line geocoding documentation