Closed natalia-fitzgerald closed 1 month ago
@angelcardoz @nongarak @shindigira We are blocked on moving forward with this content task pending some NIC/Federal Reserve information that Alex is trying to confirm. If we do not receive word by Wednesday, 10/16/2024 we will come up with an interim solution based on the information we have and can then iterate at a later date when we confirm the information.
Per the 10/10 email response from the Federal Reserve Board (the details of which can be found at [enterprise]/sbl-data-collection/issues/750#issuecomment-361742), the answer to this question:
- Is FR Y-10 the required way to connect your NIC data with your LEI? How do independent banks connect their LEI to their NIC data?
is that for many banks, the answer is yes. Banks that are regulated by the Federal Reserve, which includes banks that have a Bank Holding Company (BHC) as a parent and "state member banks" (which is just a particular kind of bank having to do with the way it is 'chartered', don't worry too much about it), are required to submit a FR-Y-10 form whenever they have a change in structure, including LEI updates. What we've learned from his email is that banks that are not regulated directly by the Federal Reserve (e.g. they have another prudential regulator, like the FDIC or OCC), are not obligated to file a FR-Y-10 and indeed follow a different process for updating information that gets populated in NIC. Rob was unable to tell me what the process is for those banks, except for that they update their information which may or may not mandatorily or not mandatorily include LEI directly with their regulators, and then those regulators send updates through some other process to the reserve banks, who then send it to the FRB to update NIC.
There are still lots of hazy pieces to this puzzle and early next week I will send a follow up email asking for clarification. Our contact and myself are both out tomorrow, so that's the earliest this could happen (unless @Kibrael or @cdorney25 want to take a stab at it).
@nongarak Here are some options for accommodating the concepts shared above.
This option is too long but includes all of the concepts |
---|
Are we losing any essential context here or are the basics covered? I can move the linking of NIC to the Federal Reserve to the intro for the page because this seems to be something that applies to NIC as a whole and not just this section. | Option 1 | Option 2 |
---|---|---|
This does make the intro text one line longer than preferred but it does seem like this qualifier needs to live closer to where we introduce the idea of NIC. Unless there's a specific reason we want/need it to appear in this immediate section of the page. | Current | Changed to accommodate Federal Reserve connection to NIC |
---|---|---|
@angelcardoz I talked through this with @Kibrael and he has a preference for Option 1.
Looks great! One thing: "If your financial institution has an RSSD ID number and "not applicable is shown below" - should the and be a but? Would that make it clearer? I think they're both logically correct, but I think but checks them and makes them consider that there may be an issue.
Here's where we landed after today's dev/design sync.
@shindigira Here's where we've landed after some adjustments I made with Angel yesterday.
View your financial institution profile
Update your financial institution profile
Currently, the Small business lending data filing platform has an option to update several fields of user-defined data about a financial institution, including adding RSSD ID, and TIN. We are making a change to disallow user-supplied RSSD IDs.
Task
Update helper text on the View/Update your financial institution profile pages to include new instructions adding or updating a financial institution's RSSD ID through NIC
Current text
View
Update
RSSD ID update instructions (provided by data team)