Closed stef closed 2 years ago
Sorry for the confusion. I believe this "internal" string should be omitted. It was introduced in https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque/commit/950f2f0586dd03a2b3ffab11008c21a4d0d3f12b back when there was an "external" and "internal" mode for the envelope configuration portion of the protocol. Now that we no longer have those, we should have removed this internal configuration reference, but failed to.
Indeed! Good catch 👍
in https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque/blob/master/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque.md#configurations-configurations says the following:
and then a few lines below that this:
the next to last tuple member
internal
is inconsistent with the first quoted line, instead the group should be listed here. and i'm not quite sure if it is correct for the context, for me this is confusing, what is thisinternal
and how this relates - if at all - to the context.