Closed jscaber closed 6 years ago
@nickilott can you please have a look at this, taking into account our conversation in https://github.com/cgat-developers/cgat-flow/pull/21 and https://github.com/CGATOxford/CGATPipelines/pull/420
I will have a look at why P.clone()
does not work.
So IMHO P.clone()
should not be there in the first place. The goal of that if
statement is to create a fake output file so ruffus is happy. I agree the symlink
is an appropriate solution here.
Let's wait for @nickilott's feedback about the nreads.dir/%s.nreads
vs %s.nreads
issue before merging.
Have these changes been through pipeline testing? I remember that we removed mergeBAMFiles from the full task for a pipeline testing reason, but I have forgotten the reason why now.
Hi,
I will look at this tomorrow morning, apologies if this holds things up but I work Wednesday-Friday
Nick
Dr Nicholas Ilott
Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology
University of Oxford
nicholas.ilott@kennedy.ox.ac.uk
Note that I work at the KIR on Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays
From: Sebastian Luna-Valero notifications@github.com Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 2:47:38 PM To: cgat-developers/cgat-flow Cc: Nicholas Ilott; Mention Subject: Re: [cgat-developers/cgat-flow] Fixes for (#43)
Let's wait for @nickilotthttps://github.com/nickilott's feedback about the nreads.dir/%s.nreads vs %s.nreads issue.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cgat-developers/cgat-flow/pull/43#issuecomment-406605664, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFOY-Ng7_8QJaIhjZnV0z5mt47kbkpUCks5uId96gaJpZM4VX5xy.
That's alright. Thanks, Nick.
Fixed errors in pipeline mapping