Closed cgcostume closed 10 years ago
Does it suppress warnings like wrong arguments, too?
hmm, i don't know. we should wait for comments of someone using command line tools more often :smile: @scheibel @sbusch42
I didn't use this tool yet, but I would prefer using -q in a tool chain because some command line tools consider each output of a subtask as error (e.g. cron).
In those cases, you can always pipe the output to /dev/null as often seen e.g. in cron jobs. But a --quiet/-q option would of course make this easier.
I did it like this: qDebugs will be discarded and everything else (qWarning, qFatal) will be printed. Is every one okay with this?
Use
--quiet
and-q
to suppress any stdio output during execution.