Closed flohorovicic closed 9 years ago
Hi flo
This would be very useful, but not sure if noddymodel is the right name? NoddyExperiment perhaps?
Cheers
Mark
Mark Jessell |WA Fellow/Winthrop Professor | Centre for Exploration Targeting M006 | 35 Stirling Highway x-apple-data-detectors://13/0 |x-apple-data-detectors://13/0 Crawley WA 6009 Australiax-apple-data-detectors://13/0 Tel +61 8 6488 5803tel:+61%208%206488%205803 | Fax +61 8 6488 1178tel:+61%208%206488%201178 E-mail Mark.Jessell@uwa.edu.aumailto:Mark.Jessell@uwa.edu.au|www.cet.edu.auhttp://www.cet.edu.au/
On 29 Nov 2014, at 5:37 pm, Florian Wellmann notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
Define object (NoddyModel?) that combines input, computation, and output in a convenient way. Possibly: inheriting from both NoddyHistory and NoddyOutput (and NoddyGeophysics)? Should be possible, check!
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/flohorovicic/pynoddy/issues/3.
Good idea - I think NoddyExperiment would be an appropriate name!
We could use a NoddyExperiment:
I read up a bit on multiple inheritance and I think we it would make sense to move to "new-style" class definitions before attempting the combination (should be completely downward compatible). I'll open that as a separate issue.
Cheers,
--- Florian ---
Done! Feature is implemented and will be part of the new release (and explained in the paper with an example).
Define object (NoddyModel?) that combines input, computation, and output in a convenient way. Possibly: inheriting from both NoddyHistory and NoddyOutput (and NoddyGeophysics)? Should be possible, check!