search

cguindel / eval_kitti

Tools to evaluate object detection results using the KITTI dataset.
57 stars 23 forks source link

How to evaluate on a different class name ? #17

Closed shashankvasisht closed 3 years ago

shashankvasisht commented 3 years ago

Hi, I trained a model by combining all the different vehicle classes like Car, Truck, Bus, Tram etc as one single class called "Vehicle". How should i modify the script to make it work for this combined class.

I tried changing void initGlobals () { CLASS_NAMES.push_back("car"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("pedestrian"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("cyclist"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("van"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("truck"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("person_sitting"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("tram"); }

to

void initGlobals () { CLASS_NAMES.push_back("vehicle"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("pedestrian"); CLASS_NAMES.push_back("cyclist"); }

However i am still getting the following error:

evaluate_object smoke_common test_2 Starting evaluation... Results list: ../lists/test_2.txt mkdir: cannot create directory ‘results/smoke_common/plot’: File exists Getting valid images... File loaded Loading detections...

GT STATS

vehicle : 37125 pedestrian : 9633 cyclist : 902

DET STATS

vehicle : 27409 pedestrian : 6632 cyclist : 558 done. vehicle: Starting 2D evaluation (Easy/Moderate/Hard)... Getting detection scores to compute thresholds Evaluating on 27017 valid ground-truth instances and 18498 valid detections Computing statistics evaluate_object: /media/ADAS1/Shashank/sample_data_for_smoke/kitti/evaluation_toolkit/evaluate_object.cpp:637: tPrData computeStatistics(CLASSES, const std::vector&, const std::vector&, const std::vector&, const std::vector&, const std::vector&, bool, double (*)(tDetection, tGroundtruth, int32_t), METRIC, bool, double, double): Assertion `gt_bin<VIEWP_BINS && gt_bin>=0' failed. Aborted (core dumped)

shashankvasisht commented 3 years ago

Resolved

SofianeB-03 commented 3 years ago

Hello shashankvasisht, how did you solve it please?

cguindel commented 3 years ago

Perhaps @shashankvasisht can shed more light on the matter, but I think that the assertion error he was getting was related to the alpha angle of the detections, and therefore has nothing to do with the name of the classes (the change he reports seems to be OK). Are you facing a similar issue, @SofianeB-03?

shashankvasisht commented 3 years ago

@cguindel Yes it was an error related to AOS, the angle in my custom GT was out of the prescribed kitti range. As soon as i realized i closed the issue. The change for different class name is correct.

cguindel commented 3 years ago

Ok, thank you!