The real goal here is to provide an HTTP server library that the Python
community can agree on. By which I mean, this is something the various web
frameworks could cooperate on. There's almost no chance for that to happen
if we don't offer robust WSGI support out of the box.
I think it would be appropriate to offer both Server and WSGIServer
classes. The latter could simply be a repackaging of what we find in
CherryPy (or elsewhere, although CherryPy's seems to be the only
production-ready one).
The real value of this is going to be when the guts are rewritten in C, a
la Mongrel. The takeaway now is: provide WSGI support OTB!
Original issue reported on code.google.com by whit537@gmail.com on 4 Nov 2006 at 1:49
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
whit537@gmail.com
on 4 Nov 2006 at 1:49