Open Splendide-Imaginarius opened 4 months ago
Yes, that would be nice if you wouldn't mind. I still would like it to not be a separate node but rather have a "rife" and a "homography" mode on the one node.
Yes, that would be nice if you wouldn't mind. I still would like it to not be a separate node but rather have a "rife" and a "homography" mode on the one node.
@joeyballentine I see why that's desirable in the general case, but isn't there some precedent in chaiNNer for using separate nodes for PyTorch-based stuff versus non-NN stuff (I guess so that dependency checking works properly)?
Oooooh, right. Yes, leave it separate then. My bad
Continuing from @pifroggi's comment at https://github.com/chaiNNer-org/chaiNNer/pull/2714#discussion_r1562065046
I have an implementation of OpenCV-based image alignment (based on a homography matrix) here: https://github.com/Splendide-Imaginarius/subimage-stitcher
It works pretty well; would there be interest in a PR that adds a chaiNNer node with that implementation (subject to whatever code quality cleanup is needed to meet chaiNNer standards)? As @pifroggi observed, it might complement the RIFE implementation.