Open Gibo-Chun opened 1 week ago
Hi Lancelot, We rely on rdkit, and am a bit surprised with this warning.
But maybe rdkit's approach is the best here - I'd not expect trivalent ions to exist in 'normal conditions'
@arogozhnikov for protein structure prediction Fe3+ is quite important. Many very important proteins like ferredoxin or cytochromes contain Fe3+ (either bound to a cofactor or directly by the protein). The ability of iron to switch oxidation state from Fe2+ to Fe3+ is absolutely essential for life. In fact the default oxidation state for iron in the protein databank (3-letter code FE) is also Fe3+ https://www.rcsb.org/ligand/FE
Would be great to support Fe3+ too. For me Fe3+ predictions work
@Gibo-Chun I just tried running to predict Fe3+ and for me it works:
>ligand|and-example-for-ligand-encoded-as-smiles
[Fe+3]
Hi Simon, thanks for explanation and for checking!
rdkit repo has related discussion: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/discussions/7119
Thank you for developing chai-lab, which is an amazing tool and has greatly assisted my work. However, when I try to input the trivalent iron ion in the ligand part locally using chai_lab with the command
>ligand|FE3P [Fe+3]
I encounter an error:[22:51:19] UFFTYPER: Unrecognized atom type: Fe2+2 (0)
Does this mean that chai-lab does not support trivalent iron ions?